But how about normal lighting without flash? What about photos in a dimly lit room with no flash. Is there a difference?
Here is a chandelier with the light on in a dark room. Both photos are taken in night mode with no flash. Photos taken by Zach from Symbian In Motion.


As you can see there is a huge difference. The N82's picture lets in the perfect amount of light so that it's able to grab the details of the chandelier. The N95 failed miserably. As Zach points out in his post, this has to do with the imaging software in the N82 being better than the N95's. What else would explain this? They have the same megapixels and same lens right? Nokia N95 owners should be happy about this because more than likely since is software this can be fixed with future updates.
Click here to check out the rest of the post at Symbian In Motion. You'd find more N82 vs. N95 comparison photos and he even throws the Casio Exilim into the mix as well. Makes you happy and proud you picked up a Nokia N82.

5 comments:
This is true,I've experienced the difference.N82 is very good for night time macro photos.
I was just looking at the n82 user guide on nokia's website (http://www.nokiausa.com/A4781041) and it talks about adding location information to images. This explains the geotagging feature coming in the next firmware. Check it out.
I love this mobile phone, this Nokia n82 carl zeiss objektiv is still the best.
The phone is really great, good Handy
Nice comparison, I too was really impressed with the N82 at Nokiaworld. Has left me with something of a dilemma really, I love the camera on the N82, but I really prefer the N95 in every other respect. To upgrade or not upgrade? That is the question.
Web Design Kent
Post a Comment
Please leave your screen name so I can refer to you if there are numerous comments. Thanks!